@article{oai:doshisha.repo.nii.ac.jp:00028574,
 author = {Yasui, Kengo and 保井, 健呉},
 issue = {3},
 journal = {同志社法學, The Doshisha Hogaku (The Doshisha law review)},
 month = {Aug},
 note = {武力紛争における環境保護の手段に紛争当事者間の合意による場所的保護がありうることから、本稿では海洋生物多様性保護の場合に合意に基づくMPAが同様に機能するかを検討した。研究は、IMOによるPSSAを含むいかなる既存のMPAであっても、武力紛争時の保護区域として実効的に機能しないであろうことを明らかにした。他方で、MPAの設定が海域の重要性・脆弱性を示すことで、間接的に当該海域の保護に資する可能性もまた明らかとなった。, There is an agreement-based environmental protection measure for armed conflict. Therefore, in case of armed conflict at sea, agreement-based MPA is possible to operate as a maritime biodiversity protection measure during armed conflict. However, this research shows that any existing MPA, including the PSSA, does not meet the requirement of an effective environmental protection measure for armed conflict. On the other hand, the research also shows that MPA indirectly protects sea areas because the establishment of MPA itself shows the importance and fragility of biodiversity in these regions., 坂元茂樹教授退職記念論集, Dedicated to Professor Shigeki Sakamoto on his retirement, Article, application/pdf},
 pages = {629--653},
 title = {武力紛争における海洋生物多様性の保護 : 「場所本位アプローチ」に基づく可能性},
 volume = {73},
 year = {2021},
 yomi = {ヤスイ, ケンゴ}
}