@article{oai:doshisha.repo.nii.ac.jp:00028299,
 author = {川崎, 友巳 and Kawasaki, Tomomi},
 issue = {7},
 journal = {同志社法學, The Doshisha Hogaku (The Doshisha law review)},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {アメリカ経済刑法の理解を深める作業の一環として、また、同種の犯罪に対する日本の経済刑法のあり方を検討する際の示唆を得る目的で、銀行詐欺罪を定めた合衆国法典第18編第1344条について、その立法の背景やその後の改正の歩みを確認した後、同罪の成立要件について考察を加える。併せて、同罪に関して、被告人弁護人から主張される固有の抗弁についても目配りをし、その実像を明らかにする。加えて、こうした考察をふまえて、アメリカの経済刑法における銀行詐欺罪の意義について若干の検討を加える。, After confirming the background of the legislation and the progress of the subsequent revision of Title 18 of the United States Code Section 1344 for bank fraud, as part of a better understanding of the US white collar  criminal law and for the purpose of providing suggestions when considering how Japanese white collar criminal law should be for similar crimes, we will consider the requirements for bank fraud. At the same time, I will also look at the peculiar defenses alleged by the defendant's defense counsel. In addition, based on these considerations, I will add some consideration to the significance of bank fraud in US white  collar criminal law., 川本哲郎教授 奥村正雄教授 古江頼隆教授 古稀記念論集 第二部, Dedicated to Professor Tetsuro Kawamoto Professor Masao Okumura Professor Yoritaka Furue on their 70th birthday, Article, application/pdf},
 pages = {2475--2500},
 title = {アメリカ合衆国の銀行詐欺罪},
 volume = {72},
 year = {2021},
 yomi = {カワサキ, トモミ}
}