@article{oai:doshisha.repo.nii.ac.jp:00028295,
 author = {Matsubara, Hisatoshi and 松原, 久利},
 issue = {7},
 journal = {同志社法學, The Doshisha Hogaku (The Doshisha law review)},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {交通犯罪に使用された自動車の没収の可否の判断のためには、比例性判断が重要である。この比例性判断に際しては、刑罰と犯罪の重大性とが比較される。そこでは、没収の対象財産の価値、刑罰の重さ、犯罪により生じた損害、行為の違法性、責任、特別予防・一般予防等が考慮される。この意味で比例性から自動車の没収の可否を判断し、目的達成に有用・必要な範囲で自動車の没収を活用することは可能である。, For judge whether motor vehicle used to traffic crime should be subject to forfeiture, principle of proportionality is important. By judge of this proportionality, punishment is compared with the gravity and extent of the offenses. So the factors of the value of the property being forfeited, severity of the penalty, the harm caused by the crime, illegality and responsibility of the criminal activity, special and general prevention etc. are considered. It is possible to judge pros and cons of the forfeiture from a viewpoint of proportionality in this sense and to take advantage of the forfeiture of motor vehicle in the range of utility and need to achieve the aim., 川本哲郎教授 奥村正雄教授 古江頼隆教授 古稀記念論集 第二部, Dedicated to Professor Tetsuro Kawamoto Professor Masao Okumura Professor Yoritaka Furue on their 70th birthday, Article, application/pdf},
 pages = {2313--2342},
 title = {交通犯罪と自動車の没収},
 volume = {72},
 year = {2021},
 yomi = {マツバラ, ヒサトシ}
}