@article{oai:doshisha.repo.nii.ac.jp:00028277,
 author = {和田, 充弘 and Wada, Mitsuhiro},
 issue = {10},
 journal = {同志社大学教職課程年報, The annual bulletin of the Teacher-Training Course at Doshisha University},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {明治時代を迎えても、教訓科往来物の系譜を受け継ぐ修身教科書が多数作成されていた。その過渡期に特有の性格はどのようなものか。当時の庶民にとって常識的で基本的なものだったと考えられる道徳については、どのように説かれていたのか。そのことを徳川吉宗の命により作成された『六諭衍義大意』の解説を主な内容とする『修身要訣』（明治７年初刊、同14年改訂）を手掛かりにみてゆくことにする。そして考察の結果、この書物が旧来の道徳を保持しながらそのまま近代への接近をはかるものであったことを、とりわけ近代学校教育の導入に伴う能力主義・立身出世主義の台頭と格差の派生に着眼する性格のものであったことを明らかにした。ただしその際、近世の庶民が培ってきた通俗道徳の本来的な性格は弱まり、道徳による国民統合の受け皿となるような変容が施された。その一方で、個人が社会に参画してゆくための原動力として、通俗道徳の内容を書き換えてゆくような方向づけはみられなかった。, Even in the Meiji era, many moral textbooks were created that inherited the genealogy of those old style. What is the personality peculiar to that transitional period? How was the morality that was common sense and basic to the common people at that time explained? Let us look at this as a clue to the "Syuushin Youketsu" (first published in 1874, revised in 1881), whose main content is the explanation of "Rikuyu Engi Taii" created by Yoshimune Tokugawa. As a result of consideration, it became clear that this book was intended to approach to the modern era as it was while maintaining the old morals. In particular, it was clarified that it had a character that focused on the rise of meritocracy and rising careers with the introduction of modern school education and the derivation of disparities. However, at that time, the original character of the popular morality cultivated by the common people in the early modern period was weakened, and it was transformed to become a recipient of national integration by morality. On the other hand,there was no direction to rewrite the contents of popular morals as a driving force for individuals to participate in society., 論文(Original Research Article), application/pdf},
 pages = {3--18},
 title = {『六諭衍義大意』の近代 : 明治前期の修身教科書を事例として},
 year = {2021},
 yomi = {ワダ, ミツヒロ}
}