@article{oai:doshisha.repo.nii.ac.jp:00027298,
 author = {末松, 剛 and Suematsu, Takeshi},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {社会科学, The Social Science(The Social Sciences)},
 month = {May},
 note = {平安京の成立を考える上で、これまで「第一次平安京」説と称される、当初の平安京はのちの平安京とは異なる形態であったと理解する研究がある。本稿では、その理解をめぐるその後の研究史を整理するとともに、儀礼研究・古記録研究の観点から、あらためて関係史料を読解し、「第一次平安京」説を可能とする史料の読解は成立しないことを論じた。, There is a study to understand when in the form that is different from original Heian-kyo named "the first Heiankyo" opinion until now in thinking about establishment of Heian-kyo. In this report, I arranged later study over the understanding and, from the viewpoint of courtesy study, historical records study, read and understood relations historical materials some other time and lectured on the reading and understanding of historical materials to enable "the first Heian-kyo" opinion not being established., 論説(Article), application/pdf},
 pages = {1--21},
 title = {初期平安京について : 「第一次平安京」説の再検討},
 volume = {50},
 year = {2020},
 yomi = {スエマツ, タケシ}
}