@article{oai:doshisha.repo.nii.ac.jp:00027258,
 author = {Tabuchi, Taichi and 田淵, 太一},
 issue = {5},
 journal = {同志社商学, Doshisha Shogaku (The Doshisha Business Review)},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {本論文は、1843年にシーニアとトレンズの間で行われた国際価値をめぐる論争をとりあげ、これが現代の貿易理論形成にもたらした意義を論じる。トレンズがミルの『経済学試論集』刊行に先駆けて2国2財の枠組みで相互需要説を展開したのに対して、シーニアは多数国多数財の枠組みで生産費価値説を主張した。シーニアの議論はリカードの生産費説を発展させたものであったが、論争ではリカードの名を僭称したトレンズが優位に立った。, This paper gives a historical analysis of how Torrens and Senior developed their theories of international values. We focus on the debate between Senior and Torrens held in 1843. Torrens presented the reciprocal demand theory in 2 × 2 case. Senior criticized it, arguing that the cost-of-production theory is valid both in domestic and international exchanges, in line with Ricardo. It is notable that Senior already pointed out the critical issue underlying Mill's reversion, that is, the question of the relevance of an analysis confined to 2 × 2 case., 同志社大学商学部創立七十周年記念論文集(Special issue in commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the Faculty of Commerce), application/pdf},
 pages = {1027--1042},
 title = {国際価値をめぐるシーニア・トレンズ論争の意義 : Catallacticsへの転換},
 volume = {71},
 year = {2020},
 yomi = {タブチ, タイチ}
}