@article{oai:doshisha.repo.nii.ac.jp:00027086,
 author = {村上, 亮 and Murakami, Ryo},
 issue = {4},
 journal = {社会科学, The Social Science(The Social Sciences)},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {第一次世界大戦の直接的な契機となったサライェヴォ事件の犯人，セルビア人青年ガヴリロ・プリンツィプの評価については「英雄」と「テロリスト」のあいだで一致をみていない。これは、長年にわたり続いている第一次大戦の開戦責任問題に深く関わる問題といえる。本稿は，このようなプリンツィプの捉え方の変遷をたどるとともに，近年，開戦責任論争において批判的に論じられるセルビアの動きを分析するものである。, This paper tackles the contested remembrance of Gavrilo Princip, who Habsburg Archduke Francis Ferdinand and his wife Sophie in Sarajevo in 28 June 1914 assassinated. He was portrayed as Yugoslav or Serbian national hero, or freedom fighter on the one hand and as murderous terrorist on the other. His figure was connected with the dispute regarding responsibility for the outbreak of the First World War. Recently, part of Anglo-Saxon historiography, especially Christopher Clark's "Sleepwalkers", claims that Serbian government was responsible of the Great War and Princip was terrorist. However, this view was incompatible with the Serbian traditional narratives. Serbian politician and scholars blame for Clark's view as tendentious revision and groundless fact., 論説(Article), application/pdf},
 pages = {133--159},
 title = {ガヴリロ・プリンツィプ像の過去と現在 : 第一次世界大戦開戦100周年からの回顧},
 volume = {49},
 year = {2020},
 yomi = {ムラカミ, リョウ}
}