@article{oai:doshisha.repo.nii.ac.jp:00023007,
 author = {市川, 喜崇 and Ichikawa, Yoshitaka},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {同志社法學, The Doshisha Hogaku (The Doshisha law review)},
 month = {Jun},
 note = {昭和の大合併と平成の大合併は、ともに市町村の「自主的合併」を「国策」として推進したという特徴をもつが、両者は、(1)合併の主唱者、(2)人口基準と数値目標の有無、(3)都道府県による減少率のバラツキの点で異なっている。昭和の場合、地方自治関係者が合併を主唱し、人口基準と数値目標が示されたのに対して、平成では、自民党が主導し、基準や目標は示されなかった。本稿は、これらの違いについて叙述するとともに、平成の大合併における都道府県による減少率のバラツキが都道府県の熱心さの違いを反映したものであることを数値データによって示すものである。, After the World War II, Japan experienced two large-scale government-led municipal amalgamations: one is so-called Showa Amalgamation (merger rush of Showa era) and the other is recent Heisei Amalgamation (merger rush of Heisei era). Both two have the similar distinctions: they were carried out under the laws which promoted or hastened municipal amalgamations by means of financial incentives, but each merger was done voluntarily by the decisions of the municipalities themselves. Despite these basic similarities, there are three distinctive differences between Showa and Heisei Amalgamations, as regards: (1)advocates of the merger campaigns, (2)whether the merger promotion programs adopted population standards and reduction goals or not, and (3)dispersion of municipality reduction rates among prefectures. This article depicts these distinctions and, by analyzing quantitative data, points out that the great difference in reduction rate among prefectures in Heisei Amalgamation can be attributed to the stances of individual prefectures for municipal amalgamation., Article, application/pdf},
 pages = {331--353},
 title = {「昭和の大合併」と「平成の大合併」},
 volume = {63},
 year = {2011},
 yomi = {イチカワ, ヨシタカ}
}