@article{oai:doshisha.repo.nii.ac.jp:00016536,
 author = {安藤, 仁介 and Ando, Nisuke},
 issue = {6},
 journal = {同志社法學, The Doshisha Hogaku (The Doshisha law review)},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {社会主義崩壊を受けてチェコスロヴァキア連邦政府は、旧共産党政権に迫害され国外脱出後に私有財産を没収された原所有者に対し、当該財産の返還・補償措置をとったが、返還・補償請求権の前提条件として原所有者のチェコ国籍が要求されたため、この条件を充たさない原所有者の一部はこの措置がチェコも当事国である自由権規約26条の"法の前の平等、法による無差別・平等な保護"原則に違反する旨の通報を、同規約選択議定書の下で規約人権委員会に提出した。委員会はこれを認める見解を採択したが、この見解は国籍と財産権の関係をめぐる問題を残している。, After the collapse of Socialism, Czechoslovakia enacted legislation to restitute private property confiscated by the former Communist regime. However, the Czech nationality is required of the original property owners as a condition to claim the restituition. Some of the original property owners, who do not retain their Czech nationality, contend that the nationlity requirement is in violation of the non-discrimination (equality before the law and equal protection of the law) principle enshrined in Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which Czechoslovakia is a party, and they brought the issue before the Human Rights Committee under the Covenant's Optional Protocol. While the Committee recognized the owner's contention, this raises difficult problems concerning nationality and property rights., application/pdf},
 pages = {1--30},
 title = {チェコの没収私有財産返還・補償措置と規約人権委員会の対応 : 委員会の「見解」と「フォロー・アップ」の問題点},
 volume = {57},
 year = {2006},
 yomi = {アンドウ, ニスケ}
}